Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | ZTE |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2021-06-04 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 35.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XR has a score of 82, which is a little bit better than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra's 78.1 score. Even being the best phone in our current comparison, Apple iPhone XR's body is older, a little bit heavier and a bit thicker than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra. The iPhone XR features a little better performance than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM and lesser and slower CPU cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The iPhone XR counts with a bit better looking screen than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, although it has a quite smaller screen, a bit worse pixels density and a lot worse resolution of 828 x 1792. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features a much greater storage to install applications and games than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 128 GB internal memory.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a much better battery duration than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 56% more battery capacity. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra takes much clearer photographs and videos than iPhone XR, because it has a way better resolution camera in the back, a bigger aperture for better low-light photos and video and a much higher video definition.
Apple iPhone XR and the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra cost the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.