Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-09-21 | -- |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 6.24 ounces | -- |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2480 x 220 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Yes GPU |
| 10.26 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS has a score of 84.2, which is slightly better than the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s general score of 82.2. IPhone XS has a lot better processing power than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has 12 GB lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The Apple iPhone XS counts with a much better looking screen than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a lot better 1125 x 2436 resolution. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a much better storage for applications and games than iPhone XS, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
Apple iPhone XS and Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) count with quite similar cameras, and although the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a way more mega-pixels back camera, they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rate. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a much longer battery duration than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2659mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.