Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Titan gray |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is a little bit better than the iPhone XS, with a general score of 85.4 against 84.2. The LG K92 is a extremely newer device than the iPhone XS, but it is somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker. The Apple iPhone XS features a better performing processing unit than LG K92, because although it has less cpu cores and less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
IPhone XS has a brighter screen than LG K92, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater quantity of pixels per inch of display and a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels. The LG K92 captures much better photos and videos than iPhone XS, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have a same size camera aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the LG K92 also counts with a way larger camera sensor which provides a lot higher image and video quality and a way better 64 MP resolution camera in the back.
LG K92 has a much better storage capacity for apps and games than iPhone XS, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG K92 features a superior battery life than iPhone XS, because it has a 50% more battery size.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, the LG K92 is also by far the cheapest, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.