Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2020-05-07 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Mirror black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS is slightly better than the LG Q70, having an 84.2 score against 77.9. Apple iPhone XS's construction is just a little thinner and somewhat lighter than LG Q70, although it was released around 20 months before. IPhone XS counts with a more vivid display than LG Q70, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater pixel density and a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436px.
IPhone XS features a more powerful CPU than LG Q70, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster), and they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone XS also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The LG Q70 features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone XS, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the LG Q70 also has an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG Q70 has a way better battery duration than iPhone XS, because it has a 50 percent greater battery capacity. LG Q70 captures clearer videos and photos than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier sensor capturing lower quality videos and pictures, and they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG Q70 also counts with a back camera with a much higher resolution.
Although Apple iPhone XS is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG Q70, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG Q70. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Apple iPhone XS, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG Q70, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.