Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | LG |
| 2018-09-21 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Black and Gray |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS is a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ, having an 84.2 score against 81.3. Even being the best in our current comparison, the Apple iPhone XS is a just a little thicker and somewhat heavier phone than LG V35 ThinQ. IPhone XS features a bit superior CPU than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has lesser and slower cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The iPhone XS has just a bit better display than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a bit smaller screen, a little lower resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a just a little lower number of pixels per inch of display. IPhone XS takes just a bit better pictures and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a back-facing camera with way less mega pixels, a tinier diafragm aperture and a worse video quality, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor shooting higher quality pictures and videos.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with much more storage to store more games and applications than iPhone XS, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ counts with longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone XS is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V35 ThinQ. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get LG V35 ThinQ, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.