Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS is a little bit better than LG V40 ThinQ, getting a overall score of 84.2 against 81.2. The Apple iPhone XS construction has the same thickness than LG V40 ThinQ, but it's just a little heavier. IPhone XS counts with a little bit better display than LG V40 ThinQ, although it has a little smaller screen, a lot lower resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a quite lower count of pixels per display inch.
IPhone XS counts with a little bit better hardware performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The LG V40 ThinQ has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone XS, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a slightly better camera than iPhone XS, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor offering a worse image quality, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same resolution camera, the LG V40 ThinQ also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better images and video in poorly lited situations.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with improved battery lifetime than iPhone XS, because it has a 24 percent bigger battery size.
Although Apple iPhone XS is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V40 ThinQ. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the LG V40 ThinQ, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.