Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 418 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS has a score of 84.2, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo's 83.1 general score. The iPhone XS body is a little thinner than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, although it's heavier and was released 4 years before. The iPhone XS has a better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and 2 less processing cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
IPhone XS features a little sharper display than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher count of pixels in each inch in the screen and a quite better 1125 x 2436 resolution. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo captures much better photographs and videos than iPhone XS, and although they both have the same video quality and a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also has faster 120 frames per second video frame rate and a camera with a much better 64 MP resolution.
Motorola Edge 30 Neo has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than iPhone XS, because it has 64 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo has a superior battery life than iPhone XS, because it has 4020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.