Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2023-09-14 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 10.26 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, with a overall score of 84.2 against 77. Despite of the fact iPhone XS is noticeably older and just a bit heavier than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, it's body is still just a bit thinner. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a bit more vivid display than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a way brighter screen and a little bigger display.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The iPhone XS counts with a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has an inferior number of cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo captures better photographs and videos than iPhone XS, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality and the same aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a camera in the back with a much better 50 megapixels resolution and a much larger sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a way better battery duration than Apple iPhone XS, because it has an 88 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.