Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2020-12-07 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | LTPS |
| 463 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS has a score of 84.2, which is just a bit better than the Moto G 5G's general score of 81.5. Apple iPhone XS's design is somewhat lighter and way thinner than the Moto G 5G, even though it was released many years before. IPhone XS features a much better display than Moto G 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1125 x 2436 resolution and a little bit more pixels per display inch.
Motorola Moto G 5G features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone XS, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB. The iPhone XS counts with a better processing unit than Moto G 5G, because although it has less CPU cores , and they both have 4 GB of RAM, the iPhone XS also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Moto G 5G counts with just a bit better camera than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto G 5G also counts with a way better resolution back camera and a bigger aperture to take better low light photos. Motorola Moto G 5G counts with a way better battery performance than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 2659mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.