Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G is slightly better than iPhone XS, with an 86.2 score against 84.2. Even though the Moto G200 5G is a lot newer than iPhone XS, it's heavier and thicker. The iPhone XS features a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a quite greater pixel amount in each inch of display.
IPhone XS features a bit faster CPU than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores and 4 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The Moto G200 5G features a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone XS, because it has 128 GB internal storage.
Motorola Moto G200 5G takes much better videos and photos than iPhone XS, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking images and video in poorly lited environments and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also counts with a way more MP back camera.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G features a much better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.