Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| 2018-09-21 | 2016-07-28 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS is much better than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition, getting an 84.2 score against 76.4. The iPhone XS is a extremely newer device than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, but it is just a bit heavier and a little bit thicker. Apple iPhone XS has a bit better looking display than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a quite lower 1125 x 2436 resolution and a little bit inferior pixel quantity in each screen inch, it also counts with a little bit larger screen.
Apple iPhone XS counts with a faster processor than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Apple iPhone XS also has a higher number of cores and a 64-bit processing unit. Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a very superior memory for games and applications than iPhone XS, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Apple iPhone XS features a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, although it has a back facing camera with a lot worse resolution and a worse video quality, they both have a F1.8 aperture. The Moto Z Force Droid Edition has better battery duration than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 3500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.