Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone XS has a score of 84.2, which is slightly better than Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 general score. Although iPhone XS is older than Motorola One Hyper, it's design is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner. IPhone XS counts with a better performing processor than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone XS also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone XS features a much better looking screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a just a little higher display pixel density. Motorola One Hyper counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS, because it has more internal storage and a SD card slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Motorola One Hyper has a much better battery performance than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2659mAh. Motorola One Hyper counts with a much better camera than iPhone XS, because although it has slower video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures or videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
Although iPhone XS is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola One Hyper. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the iPhone XS, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola One Hyper, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.