Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has an overall score of 87, which is a little bit better than Apple iPhone XS's 84.2 score. The Motorola razr (2020) body is a lot newer than Apple iPhone XS's, but it is just a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker. The Apple iPhone XS features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has lesser RAM and a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The Apple iPhone XS has a brighter display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a little bit greater quantity of pixels in each inch of screen. The Motorola razr (2020) has a superior storage capacity for apps and games than iPhone XS, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much better camera than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a larger diafragm aperture, a much more mega-pixels back facing camera and a much larger back camera sensor.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 2800mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the iPhone XS, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the iPhone XS. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy iPhone XS, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.