Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 15 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | -- |
| OLED | LTPO |
| 463 pixels per inch | -- |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 10.26 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS is a little bit better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), with a general score of 84.2 against 79.2. The iPhone XS has a much greater performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because although it has less processing cores (but faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
IPhone XS counts with an incredibly better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little bit smaller screen and way less brightness. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) shoots much clearer videos and photos than iPhone XS, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a back camera with a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone XS, because it has more internal memory. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a way better battery life than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 4700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.