Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Nokia |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2020-09-23 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 8.01 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Polar night |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS has a general score of 84.2, which is a little bit better than the Nokia 8.3 5G's global score of 80.5. IPhone XS's design is thinner and notably lighter than the Nokia 8.3 5G, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. IPhone XS counts with a bit better performance than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has lesser CPU cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone XS features a brighter screen than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better 1125 x 2436 resolution and a bit more pixels per inch in the display. Nokia 8.3 5G has a very superior storage to install applications and games than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Nokia 8.3 5G's camera is very similar to Apple iPhone XS's camera, because although the Nokia 8.3 5G has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for taking images in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a back facing camera with lot more MP and a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs.
The Nokia 8.3 5G features a superior battery performance than iPhone XS, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2659mAh.
Although Apple iPhone XS is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Nokia 8.3 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Nokia 8.3 5G. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Apple iPhone XS, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Nokia 8.3 5G, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.