Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Nokia |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2021-07-29 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | -- |
| 463 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS has a general score of 84.2, which is a little bit better than the Nokia XR20's global score of 80.8. Even though Apple iPhone XS is a lot older than Nokia XR20, it's design is incredibly thinner and extremely lighter. Apple iPhone XS features a little bit better looking display than Nokia XR20, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little more brightness, a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a quite higher number of pixels per inch of display.
The Apple iPhone XS counts with a greater performance than Nokia XR20, because although it has less cores (although they are faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. Nokia XR20 takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Apple iPhone XS, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, a F1.8 aperture and the same video frame rates, the Nokia XR20 also has a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Nokia XR20 has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Nokia XR20 counts with a really longer battery life than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 74% greater battery size.
Although iPhone XS is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Nokia XR20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Nokia XR20. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the iPhone XS, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Nokia XR20, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.