Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-09-21 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Cyber shade |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS has a score of 84.2, which is better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 score. Apple iPhone XS's construction is noticeably thinner and somewhat lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S, despite of the fact that it was released about a year before. IPhone XS counts with a bit superior CPU than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory and lesser and slower cpu cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
IPhone XS has just a bit better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a bit greater amount of pixels per inch in the display. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS, because it has more internal memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a better camera than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a lot larger sensor which provides a much better image and video quality, a way higher video quality, a camera in the back with a way better resolution and a bigger aperture. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a way better battery performance than Apple iPhone XS, because it has an 88 percent bigger battery capacity.
IPhone XS is a lot more expensive than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.