Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Ocean |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS has a score of 84.2, which is a bit better than OPPO Find X2 Pro's global score of 83.1. The iPhone XS is an older device than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, but Apple managed to make it lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. The iPhone XS has a bit better CPU than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has 8 GB less RAM and 2 lesser and slower cores, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a slightly better screen than Apple iPhone XS, because it has more display brightness, a higher 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution, a little more pixels per inch in the screen and a larger screen. The OPPO Find X2 Pro takes much clearer videos and photos than Apple iPhone XS, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a way more mega pixels back-facing camera, a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture to capture better low light images.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a much greater storage for games and applications than iPhone XS, because it has 448 GB more internal storage. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a superior battery duration than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 60 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.