Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-09-21 | -- |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS has a general score of 84.2, which is slightly better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's general score of 77. The iPhone XS has the same thickness and weight than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. The iPhone XS has a little more vivid display than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has much less brightness and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1125 x 2436 resolution and a little bit more pixels per screen inch.
IPhone XS features a bit superior processor than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of slower cores, it also counts with a 64-bit processor. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G captures better photographs and videos than iPhone XS, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a much more mega pixels back camera and a larger diafragm aperture for better photography and video in low-light situations.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a much bigger storage capacity for applications and games than iPhone XS, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Apple iPhone XS features a really longer battery duration than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.