Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2021-12-03 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, having an 84.2 score against 82.1. The Apple iPhone XS body is a little bit lighter and thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, although it was released many years before. The iPhone XS has a better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), and they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the iPhone XS also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The iPhone XS counts with a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with way more pixels per display inch and a way higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G's storage capacity to install applications and games is just as good as the iPhone XS one, both of them have equal 64 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy A13 5G counts with a way better battery life than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A13 5G features a slightly better camera than iPhone XS, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have a same size aperture and the same video definition, the Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a much better 50 MP resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.