Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-09-21 | 2019-10-05 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | TFT |
| 463 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 10.26 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone XS has a score of 84.2, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A20s's overall score of 77. IPhone XS's body is a little thinner and a little bit lighter than the Galaxy A20s, despite of the fact that it was released only 13 months before. IPhone XS has a superior processing unit than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the iPhone XS also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
IPhone XS counts with a lot better looking display than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot greater screen density and a much better 1125 x 2436 resolution. Galaxy A20s features a lot bigger memory for games and applications than iPhone XS, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A20s also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A20s counts with a much better battery lifetime than iPhone XS, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2659mAh. Apple iPhone XS shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lower resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, the Apple iPhone XS also counts with a much larger sensor taking lot higher quality pictures and videos and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.