Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2021-06-24 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A22 5G is a bit better than Apple iPhone XS, with a score of 84.6 against 84.2. Galaxy A22 5G's design is extremely newer, but thicker and heavier than the Apple iPhone XS. Apple iPhone XS counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution and a quite better screen density.
IPhone XS features a superior processor than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has less cpu cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the iPhone XS also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. Galaxy A22 5G counts with a slightly better camera than iPhone XS, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality and the same camera aperture, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
Galaxy A22 5G has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than iPhone XS, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A22 5G also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A22 5G features a way better battery duration than iPhone XS, because it has an 88 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.