Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 10.26 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS is slightly better than the Galaxy A25 5G, with a general score of 84.2 against 79.9. IPhone XS's construction is somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner than the Galaxy A25 5G, even though it was released 5 years before. The Apple iPhone XS counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen and much less brightness, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a just a little higher count of pixels per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone XS, because it has more internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1 TB. The iPhone XS counts with a much faster processing unit than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has 2 GB less RAM and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
Galaxy A25 5G features a little bit better camera than iPhone XS, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier back-facing camera sensor which provides a worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same camera aperture, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
The Galaxy A25 5G has a way better battery duration than iPhone XS, because it has an 88 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.