Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 10.26 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS has a global score of 84.2, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A35 5G's score of 79.4. The iPhone XS design is a little thinner and somewhat lighter than the Galaxy A35 5G, although it was released many years before. Apple iPhone XS has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1125 x 2436px resolution, a bit brighter screen and a just a bit greater pixels amount in each screen inch.
Galaxy A35 5G counts with a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone XS, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. IPhone XS counts with a much more powerful CPU than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has less RAM and lesser cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
Galaxy A35 5G counts with a very superior battery performance than iPhone XS, because it has an 88% larger battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a much better camera than iPhone XS, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a lot higher resolution back facing camera and a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.