Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| 2018-09-21 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is slightly better than the iPhone XS, with a general score of 90.7 against 84.2. The Samsung Galaxy A52 design is incredibly newer than the iPhone XS's, but it is a bit heavier and just a bit thicker. The iPhone XS features a better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
IPhone XS features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a little bit higher number of pixels per display inch. Galaxy A52 shoots better photographs and videos than iPhone XS, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a camera with a way higher resolution and a much bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The Galaxy A52 has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a really longer battery duration than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 69% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.