Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is slightly better than Apple iPhone XS, having a 91.3 score against 84.2. Although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is extremely newer than the Apple iPhone XS, it's a bit heavier and a little thicker. IPhone XS features a more powerful CPU than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
IPhone XS has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a just a little higher pixels density. The Galaxy A52 5G shoots much clearer pictures and videos than iPhone XS, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a much more mega pixels back camera and a way larger sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photographs.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52 5G has a very superior battery performance than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 69 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.