Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2020-07-16 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Prism bricks black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 463 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than the iPhone XS, with a 92.9 score against 84.2. Galaxy A71 5G UW's body is newer than iPhone XS's, but it is just a bit thicker and just a bit heavier. Apple iPhone XS has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
Apple iPhone XS counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a quite higher number of pixels in each inch in the screen. Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much greater storage to install applications and games than Apple iPhone XS, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW captures greater photographs and videos than iPhone XS, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a back camera with much more mega pixels and a way larger sensor capturing much better quality photos.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much better battery life than iPhone XS, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 2659mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is also a bargain compared to others, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.