Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-09-21 | 2016-06-01 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 405 GPU |
| 10.26 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS is much better than the Samsung Galaxy C5, getting an 84.2 score against 76.4. Apple iPhone XS is a way newer phone than Samsung Galaxy C5, but it is heavier and somewhat thicker. Apple iPhone XS has a quite better performance than Galaxy C5, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Apple iPhone XS also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The iPhone XS has a brighter display than Galaxy C5, because it has a just a little better screen density, a bit higher 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution and a little bit larger display. IPhone XS counts with a better camera than Galaxy C5, because although it has a way less mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a larger camera aperture.
Galaxy C5 has a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone XS, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy C5 also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 128 GB. The Apple iPhone XS has a little longer battery duration than Galaxy C5, because it has a 2 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.