Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 78.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-09-21 | 2017-04-07 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Blue and Gold |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS has a score of 84.2, which is a little bit better than Galaxy C7 Pro's score of 78.4. Apple iPhone XS is a newer phone than Galaxy C7 Pro, but it's just a little bit heavier and a bit thicker. IPhone XS counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a just a little greater number of pixels per inch in the display, a little bit bigger screen and a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436px.
The iPhone XS features a quite superior performance than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the iPhone XS also counts with a 64-bits processor. IPhone XS features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a way lower 12 mega-pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos and videos and a much higher (4K) video quality.
Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro has a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than iPhone XS, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 256 GB. The Galaxy C7 Pro has greater battery life than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 3300mAh battery size against 2659mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.