Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2022-03-22 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | -- |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F23 is just a bit better than Apple iPhone XS, having an 84.6 score against 84.2. Even though Samsung Galaxy F23 is just a little bit thicker than the Apple iPhone XS, it's much lighter and notably newer. The iPhone XS counts with a better performing processing unit than Galaxy F23, because although it has less cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the iPhone XS also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The iPhone XS has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a quite better 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution. IPhone XS takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy F23, although it has a way worse resolution back camera, they both have a same size aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy F23 has a much bigger memory for apps and games than Apple iPhone XS, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy F23 features a way better battery life than iPhone XS, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2659mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.