Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 463 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is a bit better than the Apple iPhone XS, with a general score of 88.1 against 84.2. Although Galaxy F62 is noticeably newer than the Apple iPhone XS, it is thicker and somewhat heavier. The Apple iPhone XS has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher screen density, a brighter screen and a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels.
The Apple iPhone XS has a more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with more cores and a 64-bits processing unit. Galaxy F62 features a superior camera than iPhone XS, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality pictures and a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
Galaxy F62 has a very superior storage for applications and games than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and an external SD slot that admits up to 1 TB. Galaxy F62 counts with a way better battery lifetime than iPhone XS, because it has a 163% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.