Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2022-04-07 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 10.26 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS has a global score of 84.2, which is a little bit better than Galaxy M53 5G's overall score of 76.7. Despite being the best in this comparison, iPhone XS's body is noticeably older, just a bit heavier and just a little bit thicker than the Galaxy M53 5G. The iPhone XS has a brighter screen than Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better amount of pixels per screen inch and a bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution.
Apple iPhone XS counts with a lot better performance than Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. Galaxy M53 5G counts with a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 64 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy M53 5G has a much longer battery performance than iPhone XS, because it has an 88 percent more battery size. Galaxy M53 5G captures a little bit better pictures and videos than iPhone XS, because although it has a way smaller sensor, and they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy M53 5G also counts with a back facing camera with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.