Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is better than iPhone XS, with a general score of 98 against 84.2. Even though the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is newer than iPhone XS, it's somewhat thicker and extremely heavier. IPhone XS features a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has lesser RAM memory and lesser and slower cpu cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The Apple iPhone XS counts with a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a quite smaller screen, a little lower pixels quantity in each screen inch and a lot lower resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than iPhone XS, because it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a way better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way better camera than Apple iPhone XS, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a lot better 108 MP resolution back-facing camera, a way higher video resolution and a way larger back camera sensor.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot more expensive than iPhone XS, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.