Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2022-06-29 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 10.26 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, with a overall score of 84.2 against 77.6. IPhone XS's construction is way lighter and extremely thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it was released many years before. IPhone XS has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite better 1125 x 2436px resolution and a just a little greater pixel quantity per inch of display.
The iPhone XS counts with a much greater processing power than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster) and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. IPhone XS shoots slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a camera in the back with much less mega-pixels, and they both have the same aperture, the iPhone XS also counts with a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a much bigger storage for games and applications than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a way better battery performance than iPhone XS, because it has a 4050mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.