Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-09-21 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 463 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS has an overall score of 84.2, which is just a bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's overall score of 80.1. Although the iPhone XS is older than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, it's construction is way lighter and notably thinner. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro and iPhone XS both feature very similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher display density and a quite better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone XS, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. IPhone XS counts with a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lower number of cores and they are also slower, and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the iPhone XS also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a very superior battery lifetime than iPhone XS, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. IPhone XS features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and video, and they both have the same resolution camera and a same size back camera sensor, the iPhone XS also counts with a way higher video definition.
The iPhone XS is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, making it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.