Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS is a bit better than the Galaxy XCover Pro, with a score of 84.2 against 81. Apple iPhone XS is an older phone than Galaxy XCover Pro, but it's thinner and lighter anyway. The Apple iPhone XS has a faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Apple iPhone XS also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The Apple iPhone XS counts with a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution and a just a bit greater pixels amount in each display inch. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than iPhone XS, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a really longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 52 percent larger battery capacity. The iPhone XS takes clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a back camera with lot less MP and a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs or videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a way better (4K) video resolution and a much bigger sensor.
Although iPhone XS is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy XCover Pro. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the iPhone XS, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy XCover Pro, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.