Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is slightly better than the Apple iPhone XS, with an 88.5 score against 84.2. The Galaxy Z Flip design is newer and just a little thinner, but also just a little bit heavier than Apple iPhone XS. IPhone XS counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater number of pixels per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a superior storage to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Apple iPhone XS counts with a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has less RAM memory and a lower number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The Galaxy Z Flip features just a bit better camera than iPhone XS. Both of them have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, a back facing camera with a 12 mega-pixels, the same camera aperture, the same camera sensor size and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features longer battery life than iPhone XS, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs more than the iPhone XS, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the iPhone XS. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the iPhone XS, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.