Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is slightly better than Apple iPhone XS, with an 85.6 score against 84.2. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 construction is way newer and just a little thinner, but a bit heavier than Apple iPhone XS. IPhone XS features just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has less RAM memory and 2 lesser and slower CPU cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
IPhone XS has just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels, it also counts with a little higher display pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than Apple iPhone XS, because it has more internal storage.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has greater battery lifetime than iPhone XS, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 2659mAh. IPhone XS shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3. Both of them have the same camera aperture and a back facing camera with a 12 megapixels resolution.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a bit more expensive than the iPhone XS, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.