Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is slightly better than the iPhone XS, with a 92.3 score against 84.2. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a newer and just a bit thinner phone than iPhone XS, but it's just a bit heavier. The iPhone XS has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a little bit worse 1125 x 2436 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater display pixel density.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The Apple iPhone XS counts with a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has lesser RAM and an inferior number of slower cores, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with greater battery duration than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G captures a little bit better photographs and videos than iPhone XS. They have a 0.39 inches back camera sensor, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same diafragm aperture, the same video frame rates and a same resolution camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.