Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is much better than iPhone XS's 84.2 score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 construction is newer and a little thinner, but also incredibly heavier than iPhone XS. The iPhone XS has just a bit better processing power than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and 2 less and slower cores, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The iPhone XS features a bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a really smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes a bit better videos and photos than iPhone XS, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same resolution back camera, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a way larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 192 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much better battery lifetime than iPhone XS, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 costs a lot more than iPhone XS, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.