Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| 2018-09-21 | 2018-04-03 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Black and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, getting an 84.2 score against 83.8. Even though Apple iPhone XS and Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s were released with only a couple months difference, Apple iPhone XS is just a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter. Apple iPhone XS has just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The iPhone XS features a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1125 x 2436px resolution and a bit greater number of pixels in each display inch. The Apple iPhone XS counts with a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have a same size camera sensor, a F1.8 camera aperture, the same video resolution and a 12 mega pixels back-facing camera, the Apple iPhone XS also has faster video frame rates.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with much more memory to store more games and applications than iPhone XS, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with longer battery performance than iPhone XS, because it has a 28 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone XS is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Apple iPhone XS, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.