Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2021-04-16 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.82 x 5.25 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 11.18 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Black and Ceramic |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2480 x 1860 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 388 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 10.26 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 80.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS has a general score of 84.2, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold's general score of 79.8. The iPhone XS is a noticeably lighter phone than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, but both of them are 0.3inches thick. Apple iPhone XS has a way better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, because although it has a lower number of cores and 8 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The iPhone XS has just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, because although it has a lot more opaque display, a lot worse 1125 x 2436px resolution and a much smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per screen inch. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone XS, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold counts with a much longer battery life than iPhone XS, because it has a 5020mAh battery size. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold shoots slightly better photos and videos than iPhone XS, and although they both have the same aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold also has a lot better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.