Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2023-05-09 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 SM7475-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 725 GPU |
| 10.26 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS has a score of 84.2, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Poco F5's 78.2 score. Apple iPhone XS is an a lot older cellphone than Xiaomi Poco F5, but Apple managed to build it just a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter. The iPhone XS features a very superior processing unit than Xiaomi Poco F5, because although it has lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
IPhone XS counts with just a bit better screen than Xiaomi Poco F5, because although it has way less brightness and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a bit higher pixel density. The Xiaomi Poco F5 features a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than iPhone XS, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
The iPhone XS takes slightly better photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F5, although it has a much less megapixels back facing camera, they both have the same aperture. The Xiaomi Poco F5 has a much longer battery duration than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2659mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.