Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2023-05-09 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Black and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 524 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 1400 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 10.26 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS has a global score of 84.2, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro's score of 79.5. Despite of the fact that the iPhone XS is incredibly older than the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, it's body is somewhat lighter and thinner. The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro features a bit better screen than iPhone XS, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px, much more brightness, a larger display and a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro features a way bigger storage to store more games and applications than iPhone XS, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Apple iPhone XS has a very superior hardware performance than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The iPhone XS features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it has a way less MP resolution back-facing camera, they both have a same size diafragm aperture. Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro counts with a much longer battery life than iPhone XS, because it has a 94 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.