Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2020-07-14 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS is slightly better than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, with an 84.2 score against 78.7. Despite of the fact that Apple iPhone XS is older than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, it's body is somewhat lighter and thinner. IPhone XS counts with a brighter screen than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1125 x 2436 resolution and a just a little better quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than iPhone XS, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The iPhone XS has a faster CPU than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have 4 GB of RAM, the iPhone XS also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro captures a bit better photographs and videos than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a same size diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also counts with a back camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a much longer battery lifetime than iPhone XS, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2659mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.