Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2020-09-08 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS is just a bit better than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, having a global score of 84.2 against 81.6. The Apple iPhone XS is an older cellphone than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, but it is thinner and lighter anyway. The iPhone XS features a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436px, a quite better pixels amount per inch of display and more display brightness.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features much more memory to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone XS, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 256 GB. IPhone XS counts with a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has less RAM memory and less CPU cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a much longer battery performance than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 94% more battery capacity. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a much better camera than iPhone XS, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture which is not good for capturing images or videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a much larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality pictures and a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.