Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2021-03-20 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS has a global score of 84.2, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro's score of 83.4. IPhone XS is an incredibly older phone than the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, but it's somewhat lighter and thinner anyway. The iPhone XS counts with a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel amount in each inch in the screen and a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels.
IPhone XS counts with a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, because although it has less RAM and an inferior number of cores, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro counts with a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro counts with a much longer battery performance than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity. Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro captures a little bit better pictures and videos than iPhone XS, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way better image and video quality and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.