Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2021-01-18 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, having a overall score of 84.2 against 78.2. The Apple iPhone XS is an notably older device than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T, but Apple was able to build it thinner and lighter. The iPhone XS has a quite superior processing power than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the iPhone XS also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
IPhone XS has a better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1125 x 2436 resolution and a quite greater display density. Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone XS, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a superior battery lifetime than iPhone XS, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a slightly better camera than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality and a same size camera aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.