Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2021-04-20 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, with an 84.2 score against 78.3. The Apple iPhone XS body is a bit lighter and just a bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, although it was released many years before. The Apple iPhone XS counts with a better processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), and they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Apple iPhone XS also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a bit more vivid display than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has a quite worse pixels density and a little worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bit bigger display and way more brightness. The iPhone XS features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, although it has a way tinier back camera sensor offering a lot lower image quality and a back camera with a much worse 12 megapixels resolution, they both have a F1.8 aperture.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features much more storage to store more games and applications than iPhone XS, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with a much better battery performance than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Although Apple iPhone XS is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Apple iPhone XS, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.