Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2021-04-28 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, having a score of 84.2 against 78.2. Apple iPhone XS's construction is a little thinner and a little bit lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, even though it was released many years before. The iPhone XS counts with a better performing CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has lesser RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a bit better display than iPhone XS, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with way more screen brightness and a little bit larger screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has as much memory for apps and games as the Apple iPhone XS, both of them have exactly the same internal memory.
IPhone XS takes just a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a camera in the back with a much worse resolution, they both have a F1.8 aperture. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a way better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2659mAh.
Although iPhone XS is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.